The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that public transport plays a vital factor on gridlocks reduction. However, I disagree with the idea of supply it free everyday being the best solution.
On the one hand, free public transport has huge benefits on citizens. First, it assists to eliminate traffic jam, ease the large volume of private cars traveling, meaning that car emissions and exhaust fumes are limited. Rather than worrying about wasted hours on streets or how to park cars in crowded cities, commuters have more relaxed times due to the convenience of well-designed transport systems. Second, it is of great value when public transports are subsidized by the government. No travel costs have to be paid, giving deprived people more opportunities commuting within their country to seek employment and ameliorate the living conditions.
On the other hand, the drawbacks of free public means of transport should not be neglected. One disadvantage is that buses and trains are free of charge, leading to excessive utilization. There always are full of people, and because of this, the incidence of crimes will become increasingly. Also, dispose of waste is such a vexing issue that stimulates commuters to reuse their comfortable cars. As a result, this measure, by contrast, would worsen the situation. Another remarkable demerit is the financial burden on the government’s shoulder. In the developing countries, the government need to invest on a variety of essential fields including education and healthcare system, therefore, proving free public transport with finite resources might be challenging, not mention to resolving its by-products.
In conclusion, while free public transport everyday is acknowledged of certain advantages, I strongly opine that it is not the best solution to tackle traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | phuongnguyen01 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Manpreet aujla | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | PhuongLee | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | hongthuy | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | Tran Xuan Quoc | 84 | view |
- writing task 1 11
- The environment problem facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what ex 71
- some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison so as to reduce the crime rate To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- The bar chart below shows the information about the population size in an area of UK and its birth rate and death rate in 1700, 1800, 1900 ad 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about water use in China USA Russia and Australia in 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gridlocks'' or 'gridlock's'?
Suggestion: gridlocks'; gridlock's
...ublic transport plays a vital factor on gridlocks reduction. However, I disagree with the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'frees'?
Suggestion: frees
..., I disagree with the idea of supply it free everyday being the best solution. On t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...leading to excessive utilization. There always are full of people, and because of this, th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...conclusion, while free public transport everyday is acknowledged of certain advantages, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43772241993 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01002828226 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644128113879 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8021043352 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170646943975 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552213867996 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455867837207 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113117694571 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217070024452 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.