It is said that the best way to solve the world's environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that the best measure to deal with the world’s environmental problem is to raise the cost of fuel. While this approach is effective to some degree, there are other better measures that the government should take into consideration
On the on hand, I accept that increasing the price of fuel is an efficient way to tackle environmental problem. In fact, private vehicles such as cars or motorbikes are a main cause for the air pollution worldwide as they produce a lagre amount of carbon dioxide which greatly contributes to the greenhouse gas effect. Therefore, if the cost of fuel were excessively exorbitant, people would be motivated to leave their cars at home and rely on public transport , waliking or cycling to commute to work. Such an initiative would gradually form a habit of walking and cycling among occupied individuals, which positively affects the improvement of air quality. In addition, with the price of fuel increased by governments, people might have to economize on their daily consumption of energy. As a result, the amount of natural resources such as water or oil which is exploited to supply electricity or ennergy on a global scale might be reduced, which can have good influences on the environment.
On the other hand , I still believe that there are several more effective measures for the governments to solve the world's environmental problem. First, the government should launch national campaigns in order to heighten public awareness of the importance of environmental protection. By doing this, the amount of rubbish illegally released into the environment might be reduced, leading to a decrease in the levels of pollution worldwide. Second , more state money should be invested in advanced technologies which are environmentally-friendly and provide renewable energy. This will considerably minimize the harmful exhaust produced by the combustion of fossil fuels to generate electricty and slow the pace of climate change.
In conclusion, while raising the price of fuel might be beneficial to tackle environmental problems, some other methods should also be given equal consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Mai Linh | 67 | view |
| 2017-03-27 | lananh311a | 84 | view |
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same ways as the davertising of cigarette is Do you agree or disagree 91
- International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit? 76
- In many countries. governments spent a large amount of money on improving internet access.Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 89
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ars at home and rely on public transport , waliking or cycling to commute to work....
^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s on the environment. On the other hand , I still believe that there are several ...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he levels of pollution worldwide. Second , more state money should be invested in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33628318584 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16910642381 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.3566397982 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199421621261 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726707733971 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724304661537 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118611482633 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231237324027 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.