The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
The given graph reveals the comparison of global tourists inbound in Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and the USA from 1995 to 2010. Units are measured in millions.
Overall, surprisingly there was a significant rise in trends of all countries without any decline over the period.
In 1995 International check-in rate in Brazil was the highest with 70 million tourists, while Egypt figured 30 million and Malaysia 20 million. From 1995 to 2000, the arrival rate I Egypt rapidly rocketed (30 and 60 million respectively). However, Brazil’s figure slowly expanded between 1995 and 2005 (70 and 90 million accordingly). Additionally, Egypt continued to grow up to 2010, where, the intersection with Brazil was happened.
In Malaysia, there was a minimal increase from 1995 to 2005 (20 and 30 million relatively). In Malaysia inbound data was higher than France and the USA and France rose similarly during the given years. Furthermore, in 2010 the check-in sector of the USA was more than that was in France.
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 78
- A gift (such as a camera, a soccer ball, or an animal) can contribute to a child’s development. What gift would you give to help a child develop? Why? Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice. 67
- About Nuclear powerOpinion essay 78
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 11
- Most education systems rely on examination, but as a result children suffer from too much stress. Therefore, examinations should be abolished. Do you agree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18902439024 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83406736593 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7313417717 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0414067987945 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171669552287 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293488336839 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0286698732468 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334713673102 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.