Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which the nature of human relationships become more and more complicated, it is not far-fetched to presume that establishing constructive connection with others plays a crucial role. However, the extent of veracity in relations is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing number of people who contend that truthfulness is an integral part of relationships, and I personally repudiate this idea. In the ensuing paragraphs, the rationale behind this statement will be elaborated.
First and foremost, there is a wide array of interaction between people. There is no denying to the fact that human is a social creature, and the speaking capability distinguishes human relationship with other living things. Indeed, according to the approaches that individuals apply in order to communicate with each other determines the type of their relations. Take an experienced 50-year-old business man as an example. Having consulted with the company's financial advisor, the man has decided to invest heavily in a new high-tech stocks and necessitate to hinder his components to become cognizant of this profitable investment. Undoubtedly, if his close friend, who works in a competitor's company, asks him regarding his intention, the astute man will come up with garbled answer. In fact, he has no other choice but shading the truth since honesty can jeopardize his investment. Besides, probably, so trustworthy is his manner that his companions know him as the most reliable person. Therefore, due to the complexity of relationships, honestly is not always a best attitude.
Another crucial point which should be taken into consideration is that people have various point of view. It goes without saying that each circumstance is required to be scrutinized from diverse angles, and that is why each person's perception differs from another one. Consequently, rarely is the definition of a particular word the same in people's mind. For instance, imagine an employee who takes a day off owing to terrible headache, and sends a massage to get permission. Calling her to greet, her boss becomes dubious since her voice was not that much bad that she thought. Apparently, these two individuals were the two sides of the same coin. The boss expected that her terrible headache should be far more irritating, although the employees she is painful enough to stay at home. As a result, the matter is the way that people look through the situations.
To wrap up, it is more judicious to say that despite the fact that veracity constantly has been accounted as the inevitable principle in human relationships, it would not be sensible that always use it in our lives. Apparently, diversity in both human interactions and characteristics make people to not telling the truth, either consciously or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
- The best way to increase the education quality in the country is to increase teachers’ salary. 90
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 76
- TPO 28 integrated writing Peary s trip to the North Pole 88
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'competitors'' or 'competitor's'?
Suggestion: competitors'; competitor's
...ly, if his close friend, who works in a competitors company, asks him regarding his intenti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1066, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...f relationships, honestly is not always a best attitude. Another crucial point w...
^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...om diverse angles, and that is why each persons perception differs from another one. Co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is rarely
...differs from another one. Consequently, rarely is the definition of a particular word the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...owing to terrible headache, and sends a massage to get permission. Calling her to greet...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, consequently, first, honestly, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2404.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20346320346 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08255507037 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58658008658 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3075683328 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.52173913 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093346613859 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023621752552 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0231688044042 0.0737576698707 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528482479049 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029982969607 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.