The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The citizens of country are mirror for leaders. The good condition of citizens represent leaders of a country are doing their job well.
If someone needs to know about how effective leaders a country are, then he need to looks how citizens of a country are doing in different parts of a country. Leaders have responsibility to take care basic needs of citizens, such as medical, food, pension for old people. If citizens are not getting necessary facilities then it raise question on leaders. For example, if we look at developed countries like US, europian countries, mostly citizens are getting basic facilities of life, and leaders are less likely to be questioned on not doing their jobs. Thus, happy citizens can mean leaders are doing their job well.
There are countries in the world, where people need to fight for human rights, which paints the picture of leaders of that country. It represents leaders of that country are failing to keep citizens happy. For example, if we look at Seria, there are terrorist attacks going on, and civil war also going on, and people are living in pathetic situation. This represents, leaders of Seria are ineffective and couldn't make better decisions on time, which led the country in such tumltous circumstances.
On the other side, leaders have their own limitations. A leader is appointed for limited number of years and they can't do everything in this limited time. If previous term leader left country in bad condition and even if new leader are effective and working hard to make situation better, then by just looks at the citizens of the country may not represent effectiveness of leaders.
Thus in conclusion, well being of citizens no doubt represent effective leaders, but it can't be the only measures, there are always exceptions, therefore, it is good to look at how much a leader has done.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 83
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... medical, food, pension for old people. If citizens are not getting necessary faci...
^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raises'?
Suggestion: raises
...ot getting necessary facilities then it raise question on leaders. For example, if we...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esents, leaders of Seria are ineffective and couldnt make better decisions on tim...
^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
..., leaders of Seria are ineffective and couldnt make better decisions on time, which le...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed for limited number of years and they cant do everything in this limited time. If ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...represent effectiveness of leaders. Thus in conclusion, well being of citizens n...
^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ubt represent effective leaders, but it cant be the only measures, there are always ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ubt represent effective leaders, but it cant be the only measures, there are always ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94568690096 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62884361048 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511182108626 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2056357832 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199623093387 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782294509261 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446255004528 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127802388263 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00700630108967 0.0667264976115 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.