As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion.
It is evident that investment operations on transportation infrastructure have been attracting a great deal of media attention in recent decades due to its substantial impacts on citizens’ development. Although the proposal of citizens’ covering the costs appears reasonable, i think that it is of government liability.
On the one hand, there are a great number of advantages when the users cover the costs. First, The users’ responsibility for paying for road systems will discourage their desire for driving as they do not want bear the resultant financial burdens. This means the decrease in the emission of exhausted fumes from private vehicles, lessening the alarming degree of environment pollution. Second, Incurring the costs of road installation means higher level of responsibility of citizens when using the roads as they are their processions. This means they they will drive more carefully in order not to do any damages to the roads, reducing their opportunities of fatal accidents.
On the other hand, there are also many benefits associated when it comes to government incurring the costs of road systems. First, Governments’ liability for constructing road systems means a high level of capital investments, This will lead to increase in the quality of transportation systems thanks to their strict constructing codes, guaranteeing the safety of drivers. Second, Government disbursements on transportation facilities actually increase national incomes as the governments can freely impose transportation taxes on denizens. This is implied that the official authorities will have more money to spend on other services such as healthcare or social housing, improving the citizens’ general living standards.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should pay for the transportation infrastructure due to some advantages associated with the development of users. Users should pay more taxes to raise the national incomes for more capital spending on transportation facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | Jay1708 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | minh2001 | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | huongquynh | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-27 | drtruong92 | 56 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why it is the case?. What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places. 78
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion. 84
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 95
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 84
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... covering the costs appears reasonable, i think that it is of government liabilit...
^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: they
... they are their processions. This means they they will drive more carefully in order not ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir opportunities of fatal accidents. On the other hand, there are also many b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, second, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76666666667 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42465570046 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7528654723 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.076923077 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230825487751 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844949721312 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554310695795 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136710084107 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611194363323 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.