The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming much wider: the rich richer, the poor even poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions.
It is true that there is a widening gap between the affluent and the indigent, because while the wealthy has a tendency to become better off, the needy suffer from a more deplorable standard of living. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these potential problems.
There are two major problems of this trend. The main issue is that the health conditions of individuals who live below the poverty line are cause for alarm. This is because that medical services come at a huge cost deters them from going to hospital. Then the mortality rate among the needy gradually increases, even by preventable diseases. Secondly, the most drastic scenario is the growth of revolution and war, kinds of social conflicts. Take pre-communist Russia as an example. It was a country where a small incredibly rich elite was overthrown by the vast armies of poor peasants. The gap between the rich and the poor finally had a grown so large that it triggered revolution and briefly war.
There are several actions that government could take to solve the problems descried above. Firstly, the government can levy taxes on wealthy people and cut taxes imposed on the poor. By doing this, the government can earn adequate financial resources to allocate for social welfare and accommodate the demands of needy people as well as easing the financial burden for disadvantaged people. For instance, the policy has been applied in Vietnam, which means people who earn less than 100 million Vietnamdong per year are exempt for taxation. Lastly, job opportunities need to be created to provide for the destitute, gradually lift people out of poverty and alleviate socioeconomic disparity.
In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the gap between the rich and the poor steadily increases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-27 | lauranguyen | 100 | view |
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.The table compares mobile phone 67
- Nowadays people always throw the old thing away when they buy new things and we are living in a throwaway society What factors cause this phenomenon What problem does leads to 85
- Technologies have developed very fast in the past 100 years. However some people think that technological process has brought negative effects on the humanity. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming much wider: the rich richer, the poor even poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions. 100
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison would commit crimes when set free? What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, finally, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70621408513 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9481705294 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20921131033 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613779585026 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779941730551 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142138967007 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873216374032 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.