Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, as the result, more adults’ work at home and children study at home. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, which has created a virtual world that is transforming human life profoundly. By virtue of this trend, more and more people are inclined to choose home-working or home-schooling. I hold a conviction that it is a both positive and negative phenomenon.
On the one hand, people can reap several benefits from this trend. One of the most obvious advantages of this development is greater flexibility. By working remotely, employees can start their working days after they finish household chores or childcare responsibilities, rather than ticking to a fixed timetable. Students can work at their own pace, since online courses spare them the trouble of struggling to keep up with teachers in classes. Moreover, the advent of computers can enhance the availability of employment and education regardless of geographical barrier. Home-working enables employers to recruit people living in a long distance or even disable workers, thus making job opportunities more accessible to individuals.
Similarly, for students who live in a far-flung place or those with physical handicaps, online learning is an appropriate choice.
On the other hand, it should be noted that this trend might give rise to some potential problems. Employers many have to face difficulties in monitoring and evaluating employee’s performance, if a company is largely dominated by a flexible work mode. Likewise, distance-learning many lead to the possibility that some young students who lack self-discipline would be affected by violence and pornography on the Internet. Even more, this trend can result in the lack of close-knit community, because children and employees just stay at home without partaking or interacting with other people.
In conclusion, although technological advancements, especially computers, contribute to a forward-looking home-working and home-schooling, we still need to notice their hidden threats and take advantage this trend in moderation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | elveslord77 | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | elveslord77 | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Is this development positive or negative for both individuals and society Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Many people believe that teachers should take the responsibility for the students to judge what is right and wrong and behave well, while others feel that teacher should only take academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Nowadays, researching on animal is ubiquitous. While some people says that it brings many benefits for both humans and animals, so we need make the best of it, the opponents disagree with this idea and argue that it is very cruel. Discuss both view and gi 89
- Today there is a great increase in anti-social behavior and lack of respect to others. What are the causes of this? What measures can be taken to solve this problems? 61
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun lead seems to be countable; consider using: 'many leads'.
Suggestion: many leads
... work mode. Likewise, distance-learning many lead to the possibility that some young stud...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6875 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42278391162 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648026315789 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3915506368 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356868196658 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100125425676 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923852599481 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17632274351 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125709477005 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.