The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table graphs show the information about the number of marriages and divorces in the USA from 1970 to 2000 and the percentage of marital of adult in American between 1970 and 2000.
In general terms, there was a fluctuation in the number of marriages and divorce in the USA from 1970-2000. Besides, the percentage of marital status ( Never Married, Married, widowed and divorced ) in this period.
It is clear from the first table show that the number of marriages in the USA was similar from 1970 to 2000 ( 2,5 million) . The figures has tend decreased gradually from 2,5 million to 2 million between 1980 to 2000. On the other hand, the number of divorces increased gradually from 1 million to about 1,4 million from 1970 to 1980 while the figures for divorces between 1980 and 2000 declined gradually from approximately 1,4 million to 1 million.
The second table graph show that the percentage of marital status of adults in American had a fluctuation to some ups and downs between 1970 to 2000. the percentage of never married in 2000 accounted more proportion in 1970 ( 20% and 15% respectively). In contrast, the figures for married in 1970 had more percentage than in 2000 ( 70% and about 60% respectively). the percentage of windowed in 1970 and 2000 had the same proportion ( 14% and 15% respectively). finally, in 1970 the proportion of divorced accounted a small rate ( only about 2%) while the figures in 2000 had accounting 9%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Nisha_k | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | abelin | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Ali Rizwan | 67 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 56
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esides, the percentage of marital status Never Married, Married, widowed and divo...
^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r Married, Married, widowed and divorced in this period. It is clear from the fi...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the USA was similar from 1970 to 2000 2,5 million . The figures has tend decre...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s similar from 1970 to 2000 2,5 million . The figures has tend decreased graduall...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...1970 to 2000 2,5 million . The figures has tend decreased gradually from 2,5 milli...
^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
... to 2000 2,5 million . The figures has tend decreased gradually from 2,5 million to...
^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ome ups and downs between 1970 to 2000. the percentage of never married in 2000 ac...
^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2000. the percentage of never married in 2000 accounted more proportion in 1970 ...
^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2000 accounted more proportion in 1970 20% and 15% respectively. In contrast, t...
^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1970 had more percentage than in 2000 70% and about 60% respectively. the perc...
^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...n 2000 70% and about 60% respectively. the percentage of windowed in 1970 and 2000...
^^^
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1970 and 2000 had the same proportion 14% and 15% respectively. finally, in 19...
^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...e proportion 14% and 15% respectively. finally, in 1970 the proportion of divorced acc...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of divorced accounted a small rate only about 2% while the figures in 2000 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, second, so, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80487804878 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68969158459 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.382113821138 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3751232801 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261730565578 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129710812353 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936444453273 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211214025278 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109849636863 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.