Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades, Studying history has been attracting a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on students’ academic attainments. Although the idea that this subject teaches students nothing about today’s life sounds reasonable, I believe that it is a valuable cornucopia of information.
On the one hand, It should be acknowledged that history teaches nothing about today’s life. History is invariably associated with many abstract historical events and heroic individuals in the past, which cannot be put into practice. This means that history-specialized students would not be equipped with empirical knowledge and practical skills, which could be a hindrance to their job opportunities in the long term.
On the other hand, there are a multitude of reasons why history is a valuable source of information. First, By identifying imperfections in laws through history, the administrations could obtain the opportunity to fix its existing statute and therefore get it perfected. In fact, Due to perceiving the disadvantages of communism related to economic development and social rights, Vietnamese government now adhere to capitalism and liberalism, feeding into the economic prosperity and equal human rights. In addition, the assimilation of historical deeds and events could act as an incentive for the patriotism in citizens. Subsequently, each individual will make attempt to learn and dedicate their life to their long-term development of the country.
In conclusion, I think that history is an indispensable subject in the curriculum due to its undeniable impacts in the development of the country. Official authorities should undertake some initiatives to incentivise the desire for history learning in every student at all ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-28 | grahamoneil | 61 | view |
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 84
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain. 93
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 76
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 93
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70786516854 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37777469544 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3764079529 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214904959697 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835089719086 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930360306413 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1261070883 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058718480429 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.