do you agree or disagree? we can learn about a person from books or movies which this person likes.
The question is whether movies and books that a person watches or reads, can be as a indicator of his personality or not. Everyone in consideration to his private perspective may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. For instance, in a heated discussion, some believed movies or books advertise our character while others claimed the judgment of humans and their personality depends on the purposes which they pursue from reading books or watching movies. I am unanimous with the latter group, so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through two salient reasons:
To begin with, there is one type of humans who prefer to choose the books or movies which are appropriate with their spirit; hence, gaining knowledge about a person will not be a formidable task. For example, take a girl would rather watch romantic films; therefore, her character can account as a sensitive person who enjoy beauties; however, one should not forget that occasionally people would like to select their activities base on their interest ; consequently, obtain an understatement about them can be problematic. Again take an example that same girl with tranquil soul but her favorite and fantasy may lead her to watch the aggressive movies or fiction books or magazines. In this way, judging this girl as an angry or imaginary person would be unfair.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that sometimes people are involved in books which neither are adequate with their soul nor their interest. It can be said that a man might read only one type of book for several years because he is looking for a goal simply. To better understand, take my own experience. When I was studying in the university in the computer filed, one day a history professor suggested me to collaborate with him for doing an archaeology project about pottery in Iron Age. It could be a perfect offer for my resume. As a matter a fact, I had to write some codes related to dates of potteries, however, this task required me to research about pottery among a wide range of historical books. Frankly, it was tedious work for me but I had to tolerate if I wanted to have a bright future. In short, we may observe living beings who are reading a type of book but the evaluation of their character need to know their purposes.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that only when books or movies can be an accurate tool for perceiving humans if we know their aims from doing these activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-04 | amirbahman | 73 | view |
| 2017-08-19 | peerless alex | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at a person watches or reads, can be as a indicator of his personality or not. Ev...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, frankly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in short, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81627906977 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6678966825 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.752460781 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4375 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258207969513 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854797049106 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753726226534 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178071207407 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533839247822 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.