In developing countries, children in rural comunities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In developing countries, there is limtation in education in rural area. Many solutions have been proposed to put and end to this issue. While there are arguements for providing the area with computers and Internet access, I am keen on the suggestion of more schools and teachers.
On the one hand, computers and Internet access is beneficial in various ways. First of all, they are accessible application. Instead of travelling to school in a distance, children can now study by themselves at home with the assistance from the lessons on computers. In addition, the use of computers and online lessons save time for children to do other task. Secondly, using computers and Internet requires IT skills. Maintaining IT skills will help the children in rural area in finding their job, and furthermore, help their career prospects.
On the other hand, children who live in rural area are encouraged to go to school as the result of different reason. Schools provide children with interactive enviroment. At class, children not only acknowledge themselves but also have to compete with other pupils in the class. In addition, they can exchange their opinion with their teachers in order to understand the lesson deeper as well as ask for help while they are studying. Schools and teachers also teach the children basic skills and guidance, which neither computers nor the Internet can do. Nowadays, there is a wide range of studying documents on the Internet which can be easily found. Without any guidance, students can get lost while using those documents.
In conclusion, computers and Internet benefit children in rural area, but the need of reality guidance from schools and teachers keep playing an important role
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others say it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport 67
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n order to understand the lesson deeper as well as ask for help while they are stu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13879003559 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70126218946 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548042704626 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.864990978 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9411764706 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265904748334 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085573056478 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451033203214 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161337812226 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567650441823 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.