Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, high school programs are assumed to be better if including unpaid community service as a compulsory part. While I accept that the unpaid community service certainly brings several advantages to students as well as the community, I would argue that it should not be compulsory because of some reasons.
To begin with, unpaid community service would definitely provide benefits for both students and the community. Firstly, since the community service includes physical activities, the youth can keep fit and stay healthy. As a result, they will have more energy to deal with homework pressure. If they do not take part in any unpaid community service, their concentration ability in studying could decrease due to poor health. Secondly, unpaid community service also requires several skills such as communication skill, negotiation skill, which enables youngsters to learn those necessary skills through practical situations. Consequently, students can take comprehensive development.
However, unpaid community service as a compulsory part of high school program also shows its negative side. First and foremost, there are a great number of students who want to take part in a physical training such as football match or badminton math rather than participating in an unpaid community service. This might negatively affect their attitudes and prevent them from improving their talents. In addition, the entrance exam for an undergraduate degree is important, so the young should focus on academic lessons rather than spending their time to take part in unpaid community service. If they do not concentrate on major subjects such as math, physic, they could receive a low grade on the entrance exam, which might reduce their opportunities to study in reputed universities.
In summary, while I agree that there are several advantages the unpaid community service provides to students as well as the community, I disagree with the idea that it should be a compulsory part of high school curriculums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | shayma | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Sohaib270 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mihir Rami | 78 | view |
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things and we are living in a throw away society What fators cause this phenomenon What problem does the phenomenon lead to 40
- Some people think that computers and the Internet are more inportant for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one’s own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42993630573 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87023960436 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554140127389 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3339976574 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27339389443 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102683070487 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859873740894 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202621815486 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606479345054 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.