Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Education is an important part of our lives since it shapes most of our beliefs and affects our lifestyles. In the learning process, educators play the biggest role as they are like a boss in a company or a commander in a battle that direct people to the best ways. By contemplating this in mind, some individuals believe that human being should appreciate their teachers as much as possible. However, they adamantly claim that the required esteem is ignored by the students in recent decades, others disagree. Personally, I am of the belief that in the past, teachers had more respect among their students and their community as well. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, in the past the number of educated people were lesser than current situation so being an educated person was a big ambition for most of the people. Besides, the teachers were the only source to achieve this goal so the persons who want to learn something appreciated their teachers to satisfy them teach what they pursued. For example, my grandfather was a teacher when he was young as his father was an educator. So my grandfather became a teacher and had a high respect among his community. All his students worked in his house as a waiter and had no complaint about this issue. Compared the mentioned situation with the current respect for teachers illuminate this argument.
Second, now people have more accessibility to a huge amount of data so they can learn whatever they want easily without spending a lot of time and money in their home through Internet. Therefore, the education process has changed a lot and the traditional teaching is no more valuable among young people. Besides, by easy access to this huge amount of data, a student can easily find their teachers mistakes and this errors would harm the teachers' prestige. Moreover, in the past youngsters were more polite and had more esteem toward the older people. Nowadays teenagers are extremely defiant compared to the previous generation so they had no patience about their teachers' faults.
All in all, teachers had received more honors in the past because the people were more interested in gaining knowledge and there were a few sources for learning. In addition, now youngsters have an easy access to what data they want.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, people were happier than today? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...easily find their teachers mistakes and this errors would harm the teachers prestige...
^^^^
Line 6, column 196, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...rning. In addition, now youngsters have an easy access to what data they want.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86180904523 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56982119224 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517587939698 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3922300057 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.842105263 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223721705352 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699915222317 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597380676886 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150825801121 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367821964262 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.