The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Leadership can be earned in many ways such as cooperation or competition. Cooperation offers co-working, brainstorming, balancing opposite sides and improvement by critics. On the hand, competition creates ambitious people and offers decision from one hand. In my opinion, for societies, it is more appropriate to create a leadership definition based on cooperation rather than competition.
Firstly, one advantage of cooperation is a productive environment with different ideas and work division in areas such industry, government. To put it another way, we can progress faster and easily by allocating works into different departments or segments of people. For instance, in an industrial entity or even different industrial firms dividing works into departments fairly and rationally according to their specialties rather than rivalry for being in front provides an effective consequences.
Secondly, cooperation leads to brainstorming, innovation. For instance in science, many projects improve themselves by co-working. For instance, solar systems in Germany has become more applicaple than in other countries because of their working structure, they are not competing for name but more ameliorated and user friendly systems.
Besides, gathering people of different visions enables entities to be more critical so that idea becomes more fair or suitable by listening demands of all segments. As a result, we can end up with a for more beneficial idea instead of conservative and open to a specific group of people. For instance, in a democratic country, legislation and assembly is separated to progress more fair and effectively.
On the other hand, one possible drawback against these is that cooperative environment can have adverse voices so that problems can get chaotic, in addition to that, these issues can be personalized in a way and these can follow a result as deviating from main issue. Notwithstanding, there is a known fact that competition makes people more ambitious hence cooperated people may act less passionately or devotedly that competitive people.
All considering these, we can conclude that these two notions have possible and negative drawbacks. In my opinion, positive effects of cooperation exceed negative ones.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:People should sometimes do things that they donot enjoy doing.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does. 87
- The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergartners."We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Greenwo 58
- Science is meaningless without religion. 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...or being in front provides an effective consequences. Secondly, cooperation leads to brain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...withstanding, there is a known fact that competition makes people more ambitious ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63529411765 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20843934725 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4097801926 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.705882353 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158949366108 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052777439475 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429905149744 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811944603761 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459407565259 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.