remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils
The reading and the lecture are both about remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils which is a kind of dinosaurs. The author of the reading believes that there are some signs of actual tissues of the T.rex: blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. He thinks that this idea is not convincing.
First of all, the author points out that there are some channels in T.rex fossils. It is mentioned that the soft and flexible tissue which has been discovered in these channels would be a proof of soft tissues of dinosaurs. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that soft and flexible materials in bone hollows are not necessarily related to actual animal tissues. Living in channels of leg bones, bacteria produce some organic materials which are similar to soft tissue. Furthermore, he mentions that these substances are due to bacteria’s colonies.
Secondly, the author contends that microscopic examinations show some proofs of red blood cells in spheres of bones. The article notes that these spheres contain the iron which is the essential element of red blood cells for transiting oxygen. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that the iron available in fossils is not associated with red blood cells because there is no evidence of these cells. He elaborates on this by mentioning that researchers have not found any red blood cells in other primitive fossils.
Finally, the author states that collagens which are fibrous proteins have been found in fossils. The article establishes that finding these components which are in living bone tissue supports claims of actual tissue animals in bones of dinosaurs. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that researchers have never found collagens in fossils beyond 100 thousand years ago. He mentions that collagens have another resource. In fact, researchers who are investigated bones are origination of collagens.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-30 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 81 | view |
2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 81 | view |
2022-11-16 | rpinisetti8 | 71 | view |
2022-11-11 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
- In today’s world, it is very important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than works slowly and make sure that everything is correct 76
- Decreasing the yellow cedar population 68
- using burning mirrors by ancient Greeks 60
- evidence related to the reaching of Peary to the North Pole in 1909 78
- using burning mirrors by ancient Greeks 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted bones are origination of collagens.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, in fact, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19254658385 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62216281317 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4719607578 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247154402331 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695179116897 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129133163908 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168893486191 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13231771588 0.0443174109184 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.