It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Monetary problems are common in friendship. In difficulties, we may borrow or lend money and help each other. However, the question is that whether these contributions damage the relationship or not. Different people with different personalities act controversially. In my opinion, financial issues cannot obscure my links with my friends.
First of all, I do not care about money. Sometimes I forget that I lent money, book or Handsfree to somebody. For example, when I was at university, one of my close friends told me that she encounter a huge problem because she had to pay $6000 to lawyer. I knew that she wants to get her divorce and had tough life. I tried to help her and after several months I could not remember when I spend $6000. It was like a big mystery for me and I could not find my answer! Two years later, she returned my money and she was successful at court. In that time I realized what happened for my account. Thus, I learned to write my transactions at least while currency is not something valuable for me.
Furthermore, keeping friendship is more important than anything else in the world. We have to choose several close friends and then accept some responsibilities. What is the exact meaning of amity? It means stay together in happiness and sadness. In the former example, I could tell my friend that she have to solve her problem alone and it is not my fault and then I am sure when I run into trouble, my other friends will leave me alone. Therefore, if financial hardships can affect a relationship, definitely it is not worth to continue it.
Admittedly, some people are ignorant and it is possible to not give back the money or item. Nevertheless, this concern can be eliminated if we find our friends among trustworthy people and then strengthen our connections. After some months or years of cognition of people, it is time to separate our close friends and stand with them.
To wrap up aforementioned discussion, monetary issues cannot ruin a true friendship and If they did so, it shows us that it is not a true one and it is better to abandon it.
- TPO27 - Integrated TOEFL essay 82
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 93
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 1 Helping those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics 2 Helping people who cannot afford to bui 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67027027027 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86121644279 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7407776568 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1304347826 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0869565217 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100782100157 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298576204924 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279387222033 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528046315298 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152449500804 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.