Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Many people believe that teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom while others thinks informing this knowledge to students is suitable for them. As far as I am concerned, teacher should tell their social and political knowledge to students in the class room because not only does it help them to broaden their mind, but also it increase their knowledge.
The first aspect to point out is that learning social and political views, help students to broaden their mind. Hence, when a teacher talk about political and social views with their students, they think about it carefully and this helps them to reinforce and broaden their mind and obtain a better perspective. To demonstrate, most of the scientist all over the world contend that teachers have a dramatic effect on students. So they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the effectiveness of teacher statement about political view on broadening students mind. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of students believe that teacher political views expand students mind.
Another reason worth mentioning is that students improve their knowledge in other field. Today the development of technology is very fast and every things are changing. Different field of study are get related and make a specific field that become a major in university. So it is very important that student increase their knowledge in every field and this help to a prosperous job in future. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that nowadays majority of student prefer to increase their knowledge in every field to get a prosperous job and have peace life in future.
To summarize, teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom due to that it helps students to broaden their mind and improve their knowledge in another area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...them to broaden their mind, but also it increase their knowledge. The first aspect to p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve that teacher political views expand students mind. Another reason worth men...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...field and this help to a prosperous job in future. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that nowadays majo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...et a prosperous job and have peace life in future. To summarize, teachers should make th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... classroom due to that it helps students to broaden their mind and improve their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71040472564 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48253968254 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5145232096 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552927463493 0.236089414692 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217914871393 0.076458572812 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192114070884 0.0737576698707 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424889767388 0.150856017488 282% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206856905336 0.0645574589148 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.