Some people want scientific knowledge for the knowledge only whereas others want to practice this in particular field. Which one do you prefer?
The scientific knowledge has to be implemented practically in particular field do the believe of some people whereas other believed that it would be for the knowledge only. Here I am going to talk about the both side argument. According to me, I would strongly suggest that knowledge should be used physically constructed.
Firstly, the people who argued that the scientific knowledge would be for knowledge only and not any purpose. They hoped that the research would cause serious effect in the twentieth century. The biotechnology and genetic modification in the agriculture as well as in the industrial revolution leads the human beings in the long-lasting ways and vanished the nature of food culture. The chemicals doped in the food ingredients has been changing the cell structure and causes many cancers. They argued that the latest inventions would affect the ecological balance of the geological system and nature phenomenon of mankind.
Secondly, some sort of people pointed that scientific facts are involving in many merits in all around the world, especially in the fastest world. The increase of world population push the researchers to discover the new things in the farm and technology which could be very easier for the offspring to develop in a better way.
In conclusion, the scientific knowledge should be played in this world but it could do not affect the natural system of the people’s culture and food habits. Eventually, it would not cause any modification in the environment and lifestyle of the species.
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 11
- resent a written argument to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes – the government or the people 61
- You are going to visit New Zealand for an ‘English and Homestay’ program.You have just received details of your homestay host family.Write your first letter to the family. In your letter introduce yourself ask the family some questions to get in 47
- You arranged to visit a friend in England but an important event at home now means that you must change the dates of the visit Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain the important event apologise for the situation suggest a new arrangement 89
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nted practically in particular field do the believe of some people whereas other believed t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... practically in particular field do the believe of some people whereas other believed t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...g to talk about the both side argument. According to me, I would strongly suggest that knowledg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should be used physically constructed. Firstly, the people who argued that the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...of people pointed that scientific facts are involving in many merits in all around the world,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, in particular, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18473895582 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89825754133 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550200803213 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6429932748 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255949214358 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867560118675 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125446469691 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155419534029 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819508236888 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.