TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task
In light of the reading passage, one can conclude that the author believes it is too difficult to make circumstances that the human can have a permanent presence in the Venus owing to harsh condition that exist in there based on the reasons they highlighted in the article. On the contrary, finding the author's justification weak and lacking in terms of logic, the lecturer thoroughly and utterly repudiates this claim and gives some arguments in response.
First of all, the drew attention to the fact that there is high pressure on the surface of Venues which is at least 90 times greater than the pressure on the earth so, it is implausible that a spacecraft land on it. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the validity of this idea. He asserts that it is true that Venus gravity is too high, but it does not require that the spacecraft land on the surface and scientists can establish a space station in 50KM above the Venus surface where the pressure is equal to earth and in this condition no danger threaten the astronomers.
Secondly, it was highlighted in the reading material that there is a no water reservoir on the Venus that astronomers can use it and no one can survive on it without this vital material. On the other hand, the lecturer denounces this idea. The professor claims that the surface of this plant constitutes large amount of carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which they can be used for producing water and astronomers can obtain water by using these substances.
As the last point to substantiate the reading's claim, the author puts emphasis on the point that due to thick clouds that cover the venues surface large part of sunlight is reflected back and the astronomers can't use from the power cells in order to procure required energy from the sun. Yet again, the lecturer deems the author's thesis invalid. He claims that for providing the energy, the astronomers should locate in station above the clouds and in that situation not only can they use from sun's direct light but also the can exploit reflected lights which come from Venues clouds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Abbas.ghaffari | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | M.S 2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Mamalhastam | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e article. On the contrary, finding the authors justification weak and lacking in terms...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t is reflected back and the astronomers cant use from the power cells in order to pr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... sun. Yet again, the lecturer deems the authors thesis invalid. He claims that for prov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, at least, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76731301939 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5156320236 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495844875346 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1752296307 49.2860985944 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.454545455 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8181818182 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269617910814 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094097402779 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600218798132 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156127823348 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514427384778 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.