Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Questions related to the unsafe methods used of complementary medicine are frequently discussed nowadays. While some people believe that all of the approaches in alternative medicine are effective and not risky for their health, others argue against this position. Personally, I think that using complementary medicine could lead to serious implications for one’s health.
There is no doubt that using alternative medicine instead of traditional medicine is bad for people’s health. In the first place, a lot of people use only complementary methods of medicine to treat illnesses and since many of these remedies are untested it can lead to unknown side effects. For example, today some humans believe that popular Chinese healing teas cures them of different diseases. However, this tea is really a placebo. As a result, they may have no beneficial effects at all.
At the same time, alternative medicine in general, has not been tested scientifically. First of all, people currently trust that if complementary methods have evolved for hundreds of years, it is believed that they are effective. For instance, acupuncture can be used to treat backache in traditional medicine, but a lot of people use this remedy for treating other illnesses like heart disease and high blood pressure. Consequently, their illnesses could get worse without treatment from a doctor.
In conclusion, I believe that traditional methods of medicine are better than approaches which are used in alternative medicine. After analyzing the subject, it has become quite evident that alternative forms of medicine are not effective and potentially can be unhealthy.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 61 | view |
2019-09-05 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
2019-08-14 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
2019-05-07 | tontan53251@gmail.com | 61 | view |
2019-04-23 | Rihav Raj Acharya | 56 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings? 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs(for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to young children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past. Why this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...owadays. While some people believe that all of the approaches in alternative medicine are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, as a result, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.484375 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02011485709 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57421875 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2651977255 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9285714286 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178081832325 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695933954173 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041044834198 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120823297517 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306599055184 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.