Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
In Korea government encourage people to keep ancient buildings in order to pass down the historical heritage to descendant. But some people believe old buildings are replaced by new solid ones. In my opinion, it is essential to preserve a long-standing structures to educate people how much these buildings value.
To start with, it is hard to maintain old buildings because of safety and cost. First of all, basically all of ancient architectures have the potential to collapse and have been steadily eroded. As a result, these buildings will threat the public's safety and moreover make people feel anxious whenever they pass by the buildings. In addition, to preserve old buildings, government should allocate budget. It might burden people with extra tax for that. In my certain view, every old structures do not have the same history. Of course, these structures have precious heritage, but some buildings which have critical damage or cannot be repaired should be destroyed and replaced by new buildings for safety and less cost.
On the other hand, ancient buildings have not only historical values, but also demonstrate the superiority of country. For example, in Korea there are many ancient structures, especially temples. One of them is 'Bulguksa temple' which was built almost 1500 years ago and indicate historical value in various ways. Moreover, these buildings can be one of educational resources. People who are learning about or interested in history will have a valuable experience. They learn history through only books besides are able to experience directly by watching and touching. It should be much more helpful to people, especially youths.
In conclusion, it has been argued that whether old buildings should be preserved by law or demolished and rebuilt. In my opinion, too old buildings which cannot be repaired should be replaced, but government should maintain old ones which have critical historic structures.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour.What do you think are the caused of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones.How important is it to maintain old buildings? 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past. Why this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'structure'?
Suggestion: structure
...s essential to preserve a long-standing structures to educate people how much these buildi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28478964401 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76726091146 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550161812298 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2344627128 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78947368421 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352702931029 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110332710432 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890372608451 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234032355064 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757619279946 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.