Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Manual libraries were used about couple of decades ago but now digital libraries have weeded out the concept of tangible libraries. I am support the idea of those people that money should not be spent on constructing libraries as people now can find everything on the internet.
First of all, technology has driven our connection with the global knowledge. Comparing to past where we used to refer the books of different sections in order to gain the insights of world affair. However, since the technology has been introduced we can find everything on the internet i.e. from the method of sewing seeds to nuclear energy savings. It does not only provide the useful information but also make easy for people to find everything on single click. In addition to that it saves much time to find on internet rather findings the references on the books which are very time consuming.
Also, the money that are being spent on building the libraries could well be used for other work. Underdeveloped countries like Pakistan deficit budget every year. Therefore, these money can be utilized somewhere else such as building schools and providing facilities of computers and other technologies where students can come and learn the advance skills. These skills are then better be used for their practical world as they already would have a know-how about the latest technologies. While libraries on the other hand mere be filled as space to make an excuse for government to waste their yearly budget.
All in all, digitial libraries are very easy to access and usable under desirable conditions. There are many websites which gives thousands of information by just putting a single line in search item. This technology not only load up the people with information but also creating extra interest to fetch more information as much as they can.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | kgstestbig | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | kgstestbig | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Judy_Pri | 78 | view |
| 2017-12-24 | noorali.bhayani@srb.gos.pk | 84 | view |
| 2017-11-14 | RSudhir | 11 | view |
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 44
- Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 73
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think that it is a waste of valuable money. What is your opinion? 73
- With deforestation urban development and illegal hunting many animal species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction Do you think it is important to protect animals what measures can be ta 83
- With deforestation, urban development and illegal hunting, many animal species are becoming endangered as they lose their habitat and some are even threatened to the point of extinction.Do you think it is important to protect animals? what measures can be 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...n deficit budget every year. Therefore, these money can be utilized somewhere else such as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59957409341 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7159025045 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121793609326 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390887125517 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349853176701 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727705650536 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315142769358 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.