As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
Determining priorities has been a controversial issue for enterprises. It is argued that taking social responsibilities should stay paralleled with earning money. Personally, I am in favor of the above statement and will support my view with specific reasons and examples in this essay.
To begin with, gaining their level of abundance plays an indispensable role for businesses. Indeed, it is not only an enterprise’s basic function but also the way it contribute to the society. Particularly, the higher profit it makes, the more taxes the government would receive, and, as a result, better welfare would be provided, such as better infrastructure for public schools or hospitals. Furthermore, thriving in a rigorous market facilitates brands to expand their businesses, which are beneficial for the labor market, since a huge number of jobs would be created.
On the other hand, social responsibility also cannot be overlooked. It is because while a business is processing, the society is suffering from many externalities. For example, a factory producing tobacco emits an excessive load of harmful gases, and, in addition, its products also enormously affect the consumers’ health; therefore, Philip Morris, a prosperous cigarette company, established a fund for lung cancer research, since they realized that it is needed to shoulder the responsibility for this tragedy. Last but not least, enhancing public figure is another reason making social responsibility essential. Indeed, philanthropic projects, or private welfare programs are of great use to create strong impression for customers, who always appreciate ethical values when they choose a product.
To sum up, I believe that besides enriching their budget, enterprises should also run their businesses in a socially responsible manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 96
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The map below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contributes'?
Suggestion: contributes
...os;s basic function but also the way it contribute to the society. Particularly, the highe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...r private welfare programs are of great use to create strong impression for custome...
^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esses in a socially responsible manner.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65328467153 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28990863923 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689781021898 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9151788603 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104255070967 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421039519126 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466879341771 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685565604269 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376842935448 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.