In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effects on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

Essay topics:

In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effects on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

Technology has turned whole world into a global village where boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance. Presently, the replacement of traditional foods with the fast foods of other continents is supposed to be detrimental for health standards. Here, I would like to accord with the given statement.

There are multifarious points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, health problems are spreading their roots owing to excessive consumption of junk food. To demonstrate, busiest people do not have time to cook homemade foods that are time consuming. Therefore, they have tendency to buy or cook continental foods that are prepared in less time. Besides this, the widespread availability of fast food outlets also stimulates masses to have more and more western food. Consequently, the health concerns such as obesity, lower immune system, skin problems are on the elevation.

What is more, gone are the days when family members used to have their meals together at their homes. Whereas, at present, some folks prefer to eat fast food provided by eateries outside their homes instead of eating home cooked food by sitting together with the family members. As a result, it leads to decline interaction among families and it has adverse effect on their bondings. Modern youngsters want to eat continental foods while grey headed generation have desire to taste customary foods on festive occasions. Hence, sometime, the difference between food choices emerges conflicts between young and old people.

Adding to it, fast food culture is detrimental for the traditional food heritage of a country. To illustrate, modern youngsters are less willing to learn recipes and cooking methods of traditional foods under the influence of western food culture. In addition, they do not spend time with parents in order to learn the culinary skills of their home country. Thus, traditional food culture is no longer of that importance.

To recapitulate, undeniably, fast food satisfies to the taste of people at larger extent. However, it has plenty of nasty effects on the food culture, family bondings and society.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-01-07 Justin 55 view
Essays by user Justin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ike to accord with the given statement. There are multifarious points to endorse...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the busiest'.
Suggestion: , the busiest
...consumption of junk food. To demonstrate, busiest people do not have time to cook homemad...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people do not have time to cook homemade foods that are time consuming. Therefore...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in addition, such as, as a result, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28739002933 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74331045865 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577712609971 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4269859143 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.15 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276335156488 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880465477964 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693126681854 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166415739721 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032985466016 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Hello sir, i have a query?

What is the best way to write agree disagree topic

Is it right to agree or disagree completely by making three bodyparas one sided

Or
We should write two body paras for the side which we are favoring and one body para for opposite side noticing other people views.

Let me know how to approach, what is the best.

My this essay is different than previous essays on agree disagree.

It has completely one sided paras for agree

From our feedback, the best approach is:

four paragraphs, discuss both side with two reasons. like this:

1. introduction. say clearly I agree or disagree here.

2. some may disagree , two reasons

3, However, I agree. two reasons

4. conclusion

like those users:
http://www.testbig.com/users/mabick1527
http://www.testbig.com/users/sfaht1
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 341 350
No. of Characters: 1744 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.297 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.114 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.627 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.05 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.477 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.527 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5