the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011
The line graph compares the information about the quantity of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in particular city during a six-month period in 2011.
Overall, while the number of in person and by letter or email enquiries experienced a significant increase, there was a remarkable plummet in the quantity of enquiries over the timescale period. Additionally, in person enquiries was the most common choice among three option at the end of this given period.
Tourist Information Office received approximately 900 enquiries by telephone in January, which was the highest quantity, and the number of these enquiries was over twice that of enquiries received by in person. This figure then saw a slight fall and came to the lowest point in February, at exactly 800 enquiries, followed by an exponential growth of precisely 1400 enquiries in June. Likewise, the number of enquiries made via telephone was the lowest figure in January, at under 400 enquiries, this figure continued skyrocket and then dethroned the figure for in person enquiries in April, before ending to about 1900 enquiries.
By contrast, tourist would not rather send enquiries by letter or email and hence it observed an opposite trend compared to the two counterpart. Starting at below 800 enquiries in January, the figure for written enquiries was the second only common option. However, there was a noticeable decline in the quantity of these enquiries, before reach the lowest point at under 400 enquiries at the end of the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | Thaoonguyen911 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-10 | dangtrinhlt | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 61
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 78
- the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, likewise, second, so, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23481781377 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78817771908 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477732793522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3873601507 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309707504763 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15004664376 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153916839733 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243503425708 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173671476748 0.0819641961636 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.