the bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
Given is a bar chart illustrating the amount of water is used in China, USA, Russia and Australia around 2010.
It is clear from the bar chart that the amount of water spent the most in four countries on agricutural. By contrast, water consumed in Industrial and Domestic was the category receiving less expenditure.
As can be seen, China is the country which consumes the highest proportion, over 80%. While figures for this used in USA, Russia and Australia were lower, at about 39%, 30% and 35% respectively.
A noteable fact is that, the consumption of water in Russia used for Industrial was the highest, at 60%, while the figure for Australia was the lowest, at about 3%. In term of Domestic, the percentage of expenditure on this category in Australia was higher than other country, at about 61%. By contrast, spending on this item in China made up the smallest proportion, approximately 9% of the total spending in this country.
- Some people believe that history has little to tell us. Other people believe that people must have knowledge of history in order to understand the present. 73
- The pie charts below give information about the household expenditure of an average US family in different years 90
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagram below shows the results of a questionnaire showing how many times teenagers in Australia use an iPod in a week to play videos in 2009 68
- In some countries where the unemployment rate are high, most students should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88198757764 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78976730023 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7345414513 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348310970925 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156239277409 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154288427994 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252978310931 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16297567878 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.