The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town

Essay topics:

The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town.

The diagram illustrates how an Australian town collects rainwater to process in order to use as drinking water. Overall, rainwater collected from the rooftops has to be processed by chemical and filtered, before it can be used as drinking water.

Initially, the rain which falls on the rooftop is collected by the gutter and then runs down the pipe at the side of the house into the drain located under the ground. Each houses collect rainwater in such a way and passed along underground drains to the water filter.

The water filter removes any impurities and the water once filtered continues to flow into the storage tank for further processing. From this point, the water flows from the storage to the water treatment tank. Chemical added to the water for purification in order to make it fit for consumption. Once water is treated and made ready for drinking, it travels along the pipes that lead back to houses where people can use it for daily consumption.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (113 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-07 Esther Luu view
2019-07-16 Puzan 56 view
2021-12-10 nishchayvaid 78 view
2019-07-21 ankit5908 56 view
2019-11-20 ThaoNHP 73 view
Essays by user Princy Paul :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...nto the drain located under the ground. Each houses collect rainwater in such a way ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85542168675 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53057941908 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1665476188 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427764735583 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191794026255 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165782491988 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274955593324 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166681556109 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.