travelling is necessary for education
The importance of travelling for higher quality education, which has always been debated, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of education has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on students in recent years. It can be agreed that travelling to bigger cities or foreign countries for study has some positive aspects but some people claim that it has some negative effects. This essay will elaborate upon how travel benefits to school, college or universities students and different level of education and lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, there are numerous reasons why but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that travelling creates more opportunities, is more significant. Travelling for study can also help to gain global perspective and a strong independence as well as studying in well known college make students capable of getting best jobs all over the world. For Example, international studies have proven that students who travel to study in renowned universities are likely to get better scope than who didn’t travel. Thus, travelling for study can play a vital role for positive aspects, which has been discussed in the body.
On the contrary, some people have adopted an opposing view that youth can study well without travelling. In some cases, this statement is true. However, the country like India is facing lack of good structure of study. People can always increase personal growth, job opportunities, and technical and untechnical skills just leaving hometown.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that travelling for study can be more prominent although home town’s benefits should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-23 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | saraah1718 | 72 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | masonmount | 55 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | masonmount | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | ghazal123 | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 490, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ies are likely to get better scope than who didn't travel. Thus, travelling fo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, as well as, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85362138464 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8173881036 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265457045344 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912436537557 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731194743416 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150540282619 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104520629167 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.