Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree?
The effect of law, which was always debated, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of human behaviour has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on law changes human behaviour in recent years. It can be agreed that law has some positive impacts on human behaviour but some people claim that it has negative impact as well. This essay will elaborate how law changes human behaviour and thus will lead to a logical reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why law changes human behaviour but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that traffic and crime laws change human behaviour towards committing them. For example, traffic laws have higher fines to stop people same as life sentence or death sentence as well for other types of crime. Thus, people’s behaviour changes according to laws to play safe in society.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that government should change laws according to committed crime in particular. An illustration, Queensland government has changed speed limits and some other traffic laws to prevent accident and conjunction during commonwealth game 2018. There were too many speed cameras as well to watch on drivers on road. These things forced people to accept this change.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that, the impact of laws on human behaviour is prominent. It proved above from the different examples.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- "In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the idea of compulsory voting? 82
- Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree? 75
- Should marketing for consumer goods companies like clothing and food focus on fame and good faith or on short term strategies like discount and special offers And in what ways this can impact on their reputation Why 96
- In the education system, assessment through formal examination are still valid. 88
- tourisms 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oved above from the different examples.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, for example, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2268907563 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66101429998 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600840336134 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2205339328 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393174707005 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137858818307 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103211457082 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229353364444 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109126000587 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.