task 1: the consumption of Lamb, Chicken the period of 25 years
The line graph illustrates the consumption of four different food groups in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that while the consumption of Beef, Lamb, and Fish decreased, there was an upward trend in the amount of Chicken consumed over the 25-year period. Additionally, the figure for Fish was by far lowest during the research given.
In 1979, there were over 200 grams in the consumption of Beef and then decreased gradually to about 170 grams in next decade. At the same time, The figure for Lamb and Chicken were lower at exactly 150 grams and under 150 grams respectively in 1979. Fish was the least popular food with only 60 grams eaten in 1979. The figure then fell slightly throughout the period to nearly 50 grams per person each week in 2004. The consumption of Beef experienced a significant decrease by 70 grams, ending at 100 grams in 2004.
After the period of 25 years, the consumption of Chicken went up dramatically before reaching the highest point of the whole line graph, at almost 250 grams a person a week in 2004. By contrast, the amount of Lamb consumed declined sharply to roughly 50 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | khoavodoj | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | justtheanh | 78 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- task 1: The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030. 67
- task 1 the consumption of four different food groups 89
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7263681592 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5222065151 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8843977238 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24652139913 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946095946861 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107566797874 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161848000864 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889747421985 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.