Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Nowadays, having enough incentive for studying has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the right amount of motivation is sufficient for learning or attending in the classroom is necessary?”. It is a widely held view that frequent practice is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that frequent practice and adequate motivation play a vital role in the world of cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that those students who make a devoted effort and having a stimulating idea are able to reach the summit of prosperity. Secondly, it can be argued that having a precise plan or appropriate schedule instead of attending in the classroom contribute learners to reinforce their potential ability or theoretical knowledge. In addition to this information, a group of scientists, working at prestigious university conducted that abundant talent, frequent practice, and having adequate enthusiasm open your mind to a new idea as well academic qualification.
However, there is no doubt that attending in class instead of provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that those who participate in class are more sociable and have this opportunity to complete their assignment in a group and promote their teamwork ability. Moreover, it is quite clear that they can share their interests and findings and interact face to face.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that making more effort, having frequent practice, and acquire enough motivation in order to reach prosperity must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 88
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss your views with examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nough incentive for studying has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3642172524 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07522882507 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9005881085 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.916666667 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0982101658888 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318061203896 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029230781032 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550431144373 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293228662722 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.