Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the tourism industry in less developed countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the effects of tourism industry on people’s culture is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that tourism industry in less developed countries can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From sociologist standpoint, tourism industry can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that people’s wealth, as well as globalization, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered sociological effects and careers. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both less developed countries’ wealth and people’s culture apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, the scurrying of culture might increase the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of globalization related to this reality that the demerits of the changing of wealth and culture pertain to inhabitants. As tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of practical experiences is correlated negatively with the acceptation of local people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the culture of less developed countries.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism industry in developing countries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of globalization and tourism industry prove the significance of wealth and culture’ less developed countries, but also pinpoint jobs implications.
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree to disagree? 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89090909091 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42119016554 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2225849899 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169658844642 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711153440669 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655803658158 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113295112919 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614477320035 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.