The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
The graphs show the computer ownership related the education level in the year from 2002 to 2010. There is a significant rise in computer ownership and the educational level in the given period.
Firstly, below half of the population had a computer in the year of 2002, though in 2010 almost three out of four people had a computer in the home.
Further analysis with the educational level in relation to the computer ownership shows same proportion of growth. Where 15 percentage of high school no diploma students had a computer in 2002 but it trebled in 2010. While high school graduate students ownership has risen from 35% to 65% in 2002 and 2010. Incomplete college students computer ownership slightly went up from 2002 to 2010 by 40%. 905 to 95% percentage of computer ownership had by both graduate and postgraduate in the year of 2010 it is 20 percentage higher than 2002.
In conclusion, growth in computer ownership has been seen in recent decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | welly | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | sandeep kour | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | RahulM | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Murodjon Mamadjonov | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | marchjkd@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the man features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle number and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the U.K. 61
Comments
Thankyou. I will consider the
Thankyou. I will consider the corrections.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...led in 2010. While high school graduate students ownership has risen from 35% to 65% in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87878787879 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69206909204 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.6033975377 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503221371708 0.215688989381 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235709012163 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109941924988 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297895194145 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138568180444 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.