Topic 08 (Employee’s Involvement in Decision Making)
Recently, the phenomenon of employee’s involvement in decision making and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that employee’s participation is/are highly beneficial, such issue/issues is/are regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that employee’s involvement can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, the participation of employees can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that knowledge sharing, as well as a sense of teamwork, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered having the freedom to innovate. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both smart solutions and better judgments can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, employee’s involvement in decision might increase the consequences of security risks. Moreover, fundamental aspects of security issue relate to this reality that the demerits of sensitive information pertain to a confidential decision. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of personal benefits is correlated negatively with trusting to lower level employees. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the traditional authority of management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employee’s involvement in decision making far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of more rational decisions prove the significance of saving money and time, but also pinpoint different thoughts and perspectives implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97014925373 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57595868375 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6790346657 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3151688852 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109158156897 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130465791335 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183122390256 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117102568084 0.0609392437508 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.