The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
The given pie charts compare information about spending patterns in UK between 1971 and 2001. The charts also show a further classification by seven groups of goods.
As an overall trend, the proportion of all sectors changed significantly over the thirty-year period. Foods and cars made up to the two biggest section of expenditure in both years.
In detail, while amount of money spent on automobile dramatically increased from 22% in 1971 to 43% in 2001, the figure for food decline, by 30% from the 1971 figure of 44%. There were other small drops in the figures for petrol and furniture, which she a fall by 2% and 1% from 1971 respectively. The lowest proportion was 1% of shopping books in 2001, plunged from 6% in the initial year.
Other areas changed considerably, spending on eating out doubled, climbing from 7% to 14%. Likely, the rise was in the salary spent on computers, it grew from 2% to 12% over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | Thien Trang | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2016-12-27 | sabzaliyev | 73 | view |
- Fast foods are bad. Do you agree? 73
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002 77
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t section of expenditure in both years. In detail, while amount of money spent o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1, plunged from 6% in the initial year. Other areas changed considerably, spendi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78395061728 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71866456588 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.599835966 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1111111111 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153378165939 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605053854 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633942430821 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886160164669 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628730764689 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.