illegally age discrimination in workplaces
Recently, the phenomenon of age discrimination and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that employing base on age is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that fairness can be a plus, and I will analyze it through this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, making decisions based on a person's age can provide the society with some beneficial effects which are rooted in the fact that experiences, as well as maturity, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered skillful workers.Thus, beneficial ramifications of high performance work forces and high energy employees apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, jodging on the basis of aging might increase the consequences of being unfairly dismissed. Moreover, fundamental aspects of problems in workplaces relate to this reality that the demerits of faults of young staffs pertain to comparing with older workers. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of winning promotions is correlated negatively with illigal decisions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being necessary for progress.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of discrimination far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of supporting young workers prove the significance of employers, but also pinpoint legislating age regulations implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-17 | amin_mostafavi | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I am inclined to believe that fairness can be a plus, and I will analyze it thr...
^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...iment which discovered skillful workers.Thus, beneficial ramifications of high perfo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36231592485 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683397683398 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8242305196 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.545454545 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165348233696 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054514235361 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545254752239 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894968203155 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389739509502 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.