Mass media like TV, newspaper, and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the phenomenon of social media has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether mass items works as a pivot to shape the society or not?”. It is a widely held view, the matter of social revolution is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe, one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that media coverage such as TV, newspaper, and radio play a vital role in each society. Therefore, I express some reasons to support this idea. First and foremost is that the public awareness will be raised in terms of socio-economic, technology, medical fields, and keeping up with the latest news immediately. Secondly, by mass education, the juveniles will be able to promote their theoretical knowledge, cognitive skills, and intellectual skills as well as enjoying educational and documentary programs. In addition to this information, people’s culture, character, and attitudes are shaped by media vision. A group of socialists, working at a prestigious university conducted that the life has become convenient by the availability of video camera, useful websites, news services, print media, and smartphone.
However, undoubtedly constant use of mass media provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that mass items rooted in a wide variety of cyber crimes, such as behavioral corruption. Moreover, newspaper comprising flashy advertisement that tempts people to purchase the products without knowing them.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that mass media as a pivot to shape the society especially young people must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of change in communication. 36
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
- The right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.ant example. 78
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 80
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e phenomenon of social media has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43581081081 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08895205812 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638513513514 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6350327382 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173718203923 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550725022676 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624781258776 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986093341793 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276845458044 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.