Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Sports have always been part of national identity and moments which put together more countries in a competition have had an enormous influence on people’s relations. I disagree the idea that such events can reduce global tension and I strongly believe that these are a good occasion for most of the inhabitants of a country to be and feel unified.
International sport competitions are a good opportunity for some countries to become popular and to make those who live there to feel proud and happy. This is not available in competitions such as football World Cup. Usually, some of the supporters, if their favorite team had lost an important game, use to express their dissatisfaction by attacking the sustainers of the other team. Consequently, this attitude sometimes can take to an increased tension between galleries, but countries are not so much affected.
However, although few sports competitions can end up with violence, there are still a lot of peaceful sports, which involve expressing negative feelings. Take, for example, gymnastics or tennis. Here, can’t be told that people will cooperate with those which form the gallery of the opposite country but, at least, negative feedback is not gave. Moreover, people are interested only in the success of their team.
In conclusion, supporting a country in an international sporting competition combines the desire of succeed of a nation, but not the wishes of everyone. As a result, this is a good opportunity to unify a country but not some different ones. Sometimes the consequences of a failure can have a temporary negative impact on people’s actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-07 | Check | 11 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | Check | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | pourya | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-01 | maya ulagappan | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | ankita.hpgdc | 87 | view |
- Diagram about the production of deep fried salted peanuts 64
- FOR MORE AND MORE PEOPLE, WEARING FASHIONABLE CLOTHES HAS BECOME VERY IMPORTANT. IS THIS ATTITUDE TO WEARING FASHIONABLE CLOTHES A POSITIVE OR A NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT? 56
- You organized a party for a 90th birthday party in a hotel for a relative; many elderly guests attended this party which is of great success.Write a letter to thank the hotel manager. In your lettergive the details of the partythe reason why the party was 78
- he chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words 73
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ns such as football World Cup. Usually, some of the supporters, if their favorite team had ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...vorite team had lost an important game, use to express their dissatisfaction by att...
^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
...but, at least, negative feedback is not gave. Moreover, people are interested only i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22348484848 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06657973511 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0172879349 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.076923077 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126496705213 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475485207214 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047375162037 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776545113875 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367719790995 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.