Imitating celebrities in sports or movies is good or bad ?
The role of famous personalities in sports and movies on youngsters is widely debated with many people claiming that emulating these celebrities has some serious consequences. However, I do not agree with this and I will explain why in this essay.
To begin with, there are many reasons why sports or movie celebrities serve as a role model for children and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that these people are an epitome of sincerity, perseverance and dedication towards their goals. Moreover, the hardwork they do show their never say die attitude. For example, many children follow Sachin Tendulkar as their hero and look up to his honesty and loyalty towards cricket. Thus, by instilling these qualities, children remain focused and determined towards their career.
In contrast, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of these celebrities on younger ones. The most alarming one is that sometimes these celebrities engage in antisocial and unacceptable activities which hamper the societal values. For instance, often we have seen sports stars resort to drugs to boost their performance which can negatively affect children who follow them religiously. Moreover, these glamorous people live in an artificial world and get easily triggered by loneliness, depression and dejection in their later lives. Hence, it is apparent why imitating these personalities can bring serious damage to our future talent.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the impact of sports stars and movie celebrities is prominent on younger ones and the positives of imitating these personalities far outweigh their downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-22 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | rejeesh | 49 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | gobindh Singh | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Sinabri | 80 | view |
- Imitating celebrities in sports or movies is good or bad ? 77
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some positive and negative effects on individuals lives as well as society. To what extent you agree or disagree? 80
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree? 80
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibilty of producers to avoid over packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
- The advantage of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. Discuss the extent to which you would agree/disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experi 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43346007605 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83572706774 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3101512118 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173761687162 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624636676384 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070668873053 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126639076516 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523086486846 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.