In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the hype of cashless technology and it essentially has led to a discussion, as to whether cashless has beneficial impacts to human's society. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the positive effects outweigh the negative ones.
To begin with, there is a myriad of reasons why cashless significantly facilitates and sharpen today's modern society. Yet, the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the booming of cryptocurrency technology including Bitcoin and Litecoin services which tremendously ease the way people making online transaction on a daily basis. Furthermore, cashless provides such convenient way for shopaholics to enjoy a discount day with hassle-free and wallet's burden. More specifically, according to a survey from three universities in Australia, approximately ninety percent of the respondents agree that if it were not for cashless, they would not be able to experience such enormous improvements in their lives.
On the other hands, as the famous saying: every coin has two sides, someone holds other opinions, and they believe that cashless is detrimental because of its insecurity and lack of privacy. Based on a numerous of hacked incidents in the last two decades, cashless apparently has caused concerns to security's experts. Hence it is apparently why many are against of it.
To conclude, it is an irrefutable fact that cashless has become a magical elixir of everyone's life because it essentially facilitates the development of our well being. Although cashless may have some negative impacts from the aforementioned, I still believe that such technology is advantageous for human development and essential in this globalised world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-11 | pankzone001 | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-06 | mahdi_amanipour | 11 | view |
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasing taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform.Choose which position you most agree 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 72
- Climate change and about the roles that government, corporations and individuals can play to improve it. 85
- Give examples from your experience. In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. What is your opinion? 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. Whether you support them or not? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...it essentially has led to a discussion, as to whether cashless has beneficial impacts to huma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s caused concerns to securitys experts. Hence it is apparently why many are against o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, well, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35587188612 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11490577886 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.214750457 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.818181818 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193605104797 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710511338703 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442986423231 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109076269613 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199211077543 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.