Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Nowadays, the problem of over-packaged products has sparked a public controversy, which leads to a moot question “who is responsible for over-packaging?”. While several people believe that consumers must be held responsible for such issue, I believe that producers are legally responsible for over-packaging.
From a social perspective, over packaging is strongly related to consumers’ tendency, which means it might lead to both eye-catching design and colored packet. For example, a group of reputable scientists, working at a highly prestigious university, conducted a qualitative study to understand the relationship between plastic packaging and environmental damage as well as extra cost. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that a satisfied consumer is positively correlated with not only a fair price but also the foil-wrapped.
Moreover, I believe that extra packaging is attributable to the manufacturer, in that it would lead to a popular brand, mass production, and a competitive market. A well-known example of such attributions is food shopping, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking row material for granted. Thus, excess packaging could play a significant role in economic prosperity, international trade, and environmental issue.
In conclusion, attractive packaging can be mutually beneficial under different circumstances. However, I completely agree that the responsibility pf producers will prove to be worthwhile but also crucial to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models foryoungsters. Do you support it or not? 11
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93721973094 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65709845101 2.71678728327 135% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686098654709 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5918144791 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218855716105 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801685183401 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601685011874 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12388093188 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601965977753 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.