The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The diagrams illustrate the changes that West Park Secondary school has undergone since its establishment in 1950
It is clear that the school area was expanded, while the playground was contracted. Additionally, houses and farmland had completely disappeared by 2010.
In 1950, the school was quite small and was located to the north of the main road. There were residential houses in the northwest corner. However, in 1980, these houses were destroyed completely and replaced with a car park and a Science block. At the same time, the sports field replaced the farmland in the southwest area, while the playground located in the southeast corner still existed.
In 2010, the sports field and the playground was narrowed to make way for the expansion of the car park. Meanwhile, the school and the science block remained the same.
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the two map below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilitiesSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions? 73
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13868613139 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68904554712 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6200339763 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168546102605 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641182616333 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783272718936 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134988855161 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134727011845 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.