The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
*Fairtrade: a category of products for which farmers from developing countries have been paid an officially agreed fair price.
The two tables show the sale amounts of coffee and bananas which were fairtrade-labeled between 1999 and 2004 over UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
This five year-period witness an upward trend in terms of the coffee sales. The most considerable increase could be seen in UK, rising more than ten times from 1.5 to 20, becoming the highest one in 2004, while the sales rose moderately from 3 and 1 to 6 and 1.7 respectively in Switzerland and Belgium. And there was a slight rise in both Denmark and Sweden, increasing to 2 and 1 in the end.
When it comes to Bananas, Switzerland kept its first situation with an overwhelming increase, which was rising from 15 to 47 as opposed to UK and Belgium, which rose to 5.5 and 4 but still considerably less than that in Switzerland. Conversely, there was a mild decrease in Sweden, falling from 1.8 to 1, as well as in Denmark, a similar trend can be seen, decreasing from 2 to 0.9 mildly.
Overall, from the data we can see, the fairtrade-labeled coffee soared in these years, especially in UK. There was a different trend in the sales of bananas that the Switzerland occupied the most amount in this period.
- The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country the government s annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009 and the percentages of students economic family background 59
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- In many countries women are allowed to take maternity leave from their jobs during the first month after the birth of their baby. Does advantage outweigh disadvantages? 91
- The first graph below shoes the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 The second graph shows the percentage of train running on time from 2000 to 2009 63
- Some people suggest higher education should be funded by the government while others think students should pay the course fees themselves Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68115942029 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92631629052 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3227307577 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176080324141 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081978585957 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601715041134 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128174688813 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552775986403 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.