Lots of people copy the famous people they see on TV. Why do they do this? Do you think it is a good idea to copy famous people?
In the wake of propagation of the means of information such as internet news, TV and so on, it is more common that people access to such information. As a result of it, there are advantages with respect to the above as well as disadvantages that people mimic and copy exactly as celebrities do. This essay will present my opinion whether I think it is a good idea or not.
To commence with opinions of the opposite of good ideas, first and foremost, young generation lack of discriminatory abilities whether it is good or not. Even celebrities do something weird to get paid attention and it may result in generating revenue. This is because that there are many attention whores in the internet and young generation just mimic them without hesitation. Another effect we are concern is that celebrities at odd times suicide by some reasons and people go after them. This is the effect known as Werther Effect which refers to the increase of suicide rates following the publication of a celebrity's suicide story.
Turning out attention to the good ideas, advantages outweigh disadvantages. Campaigns are good options. A celebrity, for example, appears on a public campaign aiming for reducing crime rate and usage of drugs which may harm people. Even though such events are intended for the purpose of renovation of image for a private company. It brings a huge effect on the public. Another advocates of this position also insist that it could make people engage in periodic voluntary services such as helping people in starvation as celebrities give aids them.
To conclude, it may trigger Both effects, but I think there are more advantages than disadvantages. So I would really recommend that governments should encourage celebrities to engage in such good activities for a better society.
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values) 73
- International sporting events are costly and bring problems to the hosting country.To what extent do you agree to disagree? 95
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, really, so, well, for example, i think, such as, as a result, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84288390352 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.393716637 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188531748957 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562916816605 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563613049135 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11699874064 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825363241293 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.