Ways of communication were different 10 years back. How have this changed over the period? What are the pros and cons of these changes?
The question whether communication have changed is advantageous or not requires serious consideration. Where a significant number of people thinks its having their own advantage, some people thinks that its having their own disadvantages. Below mentioned paragraphs will elaborate about both perspective.
First of all, a decades ago, cost for communication was very high and user have to face lots of dilemma. If anyone wanted to talk with someone instantly, send any documents or to see anyone by face virtually, was not feasible. It took days to convey things from one place to another. People were investing their time in productive or connective manner. For instance, children were playing some outdoor games, ladies were invest their time in some productive or group chat. Everyone wait to receive physical letters of their loved one. Resources were less but there were connectivity with everyone not only in family but also in neighborhood as well.
However, with in ten years, generation changes so rapidly that no one has time to talk with their family atleast. Although, in some areas, neighbours do not know about each other. Its hardly matter for them to know what their names and what they do. Although with the boom in technology, sending and receiving emails or documents made easy. People can talk face to face regardless where they are. Eventually, everyone is so occupied with their virtual world that personal touch is almost about to finish.
To consider above mentioned points, in short it is easy to say that yes we have latest technology, wifi, smartphones and other digital devices now to communicate with anyone but still having a lack of some moral and personal touch and values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-16 | zeeshan | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-27 | ananddeepsingh | 77 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Talk about the pros/cons of this era as is full of daily inventions. 11
- Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books? Agree or disagree? 77
- While taking an important decisions in a company the advice of lower level employees should be involved or not? 77
- The importance of the cars and airplane in the modern life. Give examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether communication have changed is advantage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a decade' or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: a decade; decades
...bout both perspective. First of all, a decades ago, cost for communication was very hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun dilemma seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of dilemmas'.
Suggestion: lots of dilemmas
...ion was very high and user have to face lots of dilemma. If anyone wanted to talk with someone ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'invested'.
Suggestion: invested
...playing some outdoor games, ladies were invest their time in some productive or group ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...eighbours do not know about each other. Its hardly matter for them to know what the...
^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the latest'.
Suggestion: have the latest
... in short it is easy to say that yes we have latest technology, wifi, smartphones and other...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69729409004 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8114077195 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4117647059 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11663830342 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372393653064 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045317668845 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743149247324 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223204225806 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.