The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Expressing your thoughts in different languages is a sign of the smart people. Where significant number of people think that learning more than one language is less important in the future, other believe that it is not like this. Consequently, it become a moot question. I am strongly disagree with the notion and will elucidate further to support my answer using required examples and arguments.
There are myriads of reasons why knowledge of different languages can help you to grow not only personally but professionally as well. The preponderant one is that it will allure an individual to experience different cultures. In order to understand, the culture and history of any religion or the nation, one must understand their basic language so that their scriptures and other wordings can be read. Moreover, multi-language help youngster to grow professionally as well. However, an individual feel more confortable while speaking and expressing his thoughts in their native or mother-tongue. For an instance, enormous companies required people for the trades and discussion with their clients so that they can understand their need in details.
Another pivotal point is that it is benefited for the tourists as well who always ready to travel the different countries. Different languages can help them to augment an open discussion with local residents and as a result, they can get more information about the city where they will travel and it will save their pocket as well to hire a guide.
In conclusion, on the basis of above-mentioned points, one can conclude that it will be a great feelings to learn new language which add flying colours in their personality and importance of language will never jepardize in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke or decision is up to the individual level? 55
- Online shopping is destroying local business. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online shopping with regards to this statement. Support your views with reasons and examples. 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...t it is not like this. Consequently, it become a moot question. I am strongly disagree...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...t become a moot question. I am strongly disagree with the notion and will elucidate furt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feeling'?
Suggestion: feeling
...ne can conclude that it will be a great feelings to learn new language which add flying ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rtance of language will never jepardize in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18861209964 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98216393858 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0239920404 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271765331551 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893868171116 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980959047454 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183970198806 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916798162628 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.