Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Give relevant examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of classroom sessions has created controversies with many academics claiming that these trainings offer greater access to pupils and improve their process of understanding. However, I firmly believe that the only way to achieve your goal is the zeal and repetitive practice which eventually pays off your hardwork. This essay will further elaborate on both perspectives and thus, will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
Admittedly, there are significant merits associated with classroom training. Firstly, the blackboard and online sessions offer face to face interaction between the teachers and learners and thus, assist them with better understanding, guidance and clarity. Secondly, students who enroll into these classroom trainings become great learners in due course as their cognitive abilities increase while attending the live sessions. Moreover, the younger ones look upto their teachers as role models and aspire to stay focused.
In contrast, those who oppose the classroom sessions bolster their argument on the amount of dedication and efforts they put in to increase their learning skills. Moreover, it is generally believed that those who persevere and soak in while practicing and do not give up succeed more in the long run. For them, it is prerogative that they are exuberant and have the ability to accomplish their goals compared to the knowledge which they can gain from classes and study plans anytime.
In view of the above mentioned facts, one can conclude that the classroom trainings evidently outsmart the younger generations and therefore, the advantages of attending these programs far outweigh the motivation and practice level of a person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-01 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibilty of producers to avoid over packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
- Discuss any new technological development in the recent years which is a boon or curse for the society. 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 80
- Problem and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago Discuss and use your own experience 85
- Some people believe that law changes human behaviour. Do you agree with it? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51340996169 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80200558563 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63601532567 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.376285172 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177734445839 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593160547564 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433009098182 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102420771936 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270418210678 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.