Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Some people claimed that sophistication and easy access of modern living are completely harmless, but others believe that it would only hinder them from growing into robust citizens. In my point of view, I partially agree with both statements as it is only the benefit of developing world and dependency on technology. This essay will discuss further my viewpoint and will include reasons and examples.
To begin with, the steaming advantages of today's modern life is convenience and intricate belongings. While it is true that it cannot make people hurt in any way after enjoying the fruits of technology, as they will only make their life even more easier. To illustrate, the birth of shopping malls is one of the greatest perks of contemporary living providing the best comfort and service to mankind. It is indeed the results of technological advancements that people now are more relaxed and comfortable.
On the other hand, the disadvantages of proliferating world cannot also be ignored. Due to the comfort and convenience technology brings, people nowadays are becoming dependent on them. As a result, they are already living a sedentary and lethargic lifestyle. Throughout the years, they are only providing few thinking and movements every time they will accomplish as task. For example, computers are today as intelligent as humans and can be efficient in decision-making process.
To recapitulate, the developing economy due to technologies can be one of the greatest benefits any human being would ever wish for. However, it can also a hindrance for personality improvement. Indeed, it will all be dependent upon the person of how he will utilize what is available in his possession.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-15 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 85
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion? 77
- In the past 100 years path breaking inventions such as antibiotics airplanes and computers have changed the very concept of living What do you think has been the most important invention for the past 100 years Why 73
- While technology can provide benefits, it can also cause problems and challenges. Describe how technology affects you or someone you know. Include positive as well as negative effects. 11
- Write a letter to a friend to ask for his her help to collect money for a charity organization The letter needs to cover the following details Why do you want to collect money for the charity organization Ask for your friend to help Explain in detail how 98
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... as they will only make their life even more easier. To illustrate, the birth of shopping m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thinking seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little thinking'.
Suggestion: little thinking
...hout the years, they are only providing few thinking and movements every time they will acco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, as a result, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22627737226 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02596785048 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.28464302 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147757019281 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455088138198 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379436441245 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873800720421 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453453307677 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.