Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
The importance of doctor treating patient disease through video conference has always been a debatable topic. Many people claim that it is beneficial to people who are disabled. Others reject this notion and argue that all diseases cannot be cured in video communication. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both advantages and disadvantages of video communication with proper examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To start with, there are more benefits associated with virtual communication among patients and doctors. The most important one is that availability of physician after working hours is the major relief for the patients. In the fast developing world, technology has made us reach any doctor for any type of injury. For example, parents are always worried about the health of their kids and availability of video communication option made them assured that in case of an emergency they can reach out to them anytime.
On the other hand, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the video communication between doctor and patient. Firstly, technology cannot be accessed by all the people especially those who are living in rural areas and villagers cannot use technology to communicate to physicians to cure disease. Secondly, people need to have a strong bond with the doctor to understand the severity of pain and physical presence helps to understand the pain of patient to doctor. Finally, patient and doctor may have miscommunication and doctor may misunderstand the symptoms and causes to treat the disease. For example, skin diseases such as allergy need to be treated in presence of doctor which cannot be cured through online video.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that although there are some advantages of video communication the disadvantages outweigh it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-24 | mndpsngh21 | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | manraj123 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | English time | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
- "More information available online so library'sbook are useless" or As e-books are available onlinethese days, the value of printed books has diminished.Agree or disagree. 80
- Government should reduce their investment in arts music and painting Agree or Disagree 86
- children should take larger number of exams or learn more in schools? 55
- parents play imp role in educating children as teachers Agree disagree 49
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cy they can reach out to them anytime. On the other hand, there are some pitfal...
^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: treating
...y misunderstand the symptoms and causes to treat the disease. For example, skin diseases...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97395508337 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8457260106 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330998650955 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10341566345 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658241139093 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180878737795 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703897102782 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.